Posts Tagged denver injury law
Car Accidents Caused by Tire or Brake Failure
Posted by denverheat in Colorado personal injury attorney, Denver personal injury lawyer, colorado injury lawyer, colorado personal injury, criminal defense attorney denver, denver accident lawyer, denver divorce lawyer, denver injury lawyer, denver law firm, find a denver law firm, hiring a denver dui attorney, motorcycle injury lawyer on August 22nd, 2010
Accidents Caused by Brake Failure Could be an Intentional Tort
Motor vehicles are some of the most dangerous things out there. Death by motor vehicle is one of the most common forms of death in the industrialized world. Common causes for car accidents are people just spend so much time in vehicles, but also include those who break the law and have poor maintenance.
Cars, trucks and motorcycles share one thing in common when it comes to a Denver car accident. All have all of their weight supported by tires. When you think that only a small portion of the tire is in contact with the ground at all times it will not surprise you to find that over a quarter of all Denver motorcycle accidents come from problems with tires or brakes. If you have been injured in a car crash or motorcycle accident that was a result of damaged or improperly maintained tires, you may have legal recourse to sue.
There could be several different parties that were responsible for the brakes or tires. If you had an injury from a car crash involving failed brakes or tires, the negligent parties could include the driver, brake manufacturer, the mechanic, or the employer of the driver. If it was a truck accident, the trucking company might be liable for and personal injury in Denver.
Because there could be multiple liable parties, each one will probably try to shift blame and get another company’s insurance to pay for the accident. However it is possible to sue multiple parties and it is possible that several people were to blame for the accident. If you are suing multiple people it might be prudent to hire a Denver injury attorney to avoid being caught in the run-around.
If the brake manufacturer was at fault, you have a good chance of being awarded a settlement because of strict laws regarding braking systems. Truck brakes especially are regulated by the federal government to have a certain braking power. If the brakes on the car that hit you does not meet these standards you could claim the manufacturer did not design the brakes well or that there was a manufacturing defect. These kinds of cases fall more under product liability than personal injury.
If the trucking company failed to provide regular maintenance on the brakes you could sue. Some truckers even de-power the front brakes on purpose to reduce the cost of brake replacement. It seems crazy but some truckers would rather use the trailer brakes and the transmission to slow down. Choosing a dangerous thing like unhooking the brakes just for a little cost savings might actually result in an intentional tort instead of a personal injury negligence case. If this happened you could sue both the driver and the trucking company that allowed this to happen.
Workplace Injury
Posted by denverheat in Denver Attorney Finder, Denver personal injury lawyer, denver accident lawyer, find a denver law firm, personal injury, personal injury attorney on June 16th, 2010
Injured Worker
Large corporations go a long way to make sure they do not get drug into any legal battles for workplace injuries. The institution that corporations have created to insulate them is called worker’s compensation insurance. If you have been injured on the job your boss will most likely tell you that you must make your claim through worker’s comp. This is true… in most situations.
For certain exceptions you may be able to sue your employer. If your employer acted on purpose to cause your injury then he can of course be sued. If he does not carry worker’s comp, depending on the state you may sue him directly or go through a state fund for uninsured injuries. Any injuries caused by a 3rd party’s actions or negligence can also be sued. Examples are injuries from defective products or toxic substances.
The reason injured workers often end up hiring a Denver injury lawyer is because worker’s comp benefits for permanent disability are low and do not take pain and suffering into account. If you were injured by a piece of defective equipment you may have a claim, especially if the manufacturer knew about the defect and did not say anything. If you can prove they knew then they will have to compensate for injuries, lost wages and opportunities, and suffering. If you were injured by a product at work, you can recover both workers comp and damages from the company that made the defective device. Consider consulting with accident or Denver motorcycle attorney to find out exactly where you stand in a case. If you know of a piece of equipment that is dangerous and still used by a company you should notify the Labor Department’s Occupational Health and Safety Administration.
Sicknesses from toxic workplace substances is a very bad situation because the total effect of the problems often does not show up until much later. These latent injuries are hard to prove but it can be done, especially when the link between the substance and the disease is well documented. As opposed to mechanical injuries where you could use a Denver accident lawyer, poisonous workplaces are often handled by attorneys who specialize in these toxic torts, and have experience in connecting cause and effect. The most common industrial toxic substances are things like asbestos, silica and radium.
Acute or readily apparent toxic injuries are things like burnt lungs in a smelting factory. These are easier to prove and you may be able to sue your employer, the manufacturer of the substance, and any safety or handling equipment companies that were negligent. And remember, if the company injures you on purpose or has not insurance you can still sue in civil court.
Writing a Demand Letter for Insurance
Posted by denverheat in Denver personal injury lawyer, denver accident lawyer, denver injury attorney, denver injury lawyer on June 16th, 2010
Demand Letter from an Accident Attorney
The importance of a good demand letter in accident settlement negotiations with insurance companies cannot be understated, because the demand letter is the piece of information the insurance company refers to in all arguments. The demand letter is a document explaining the case and what you are owed from your point of view. Therefore it should cover the specific extent of your injuries, how much those injuries cost in terms of treatment and loss, and why the other party is liable for those injuries. The letter ends with an amount you demand to settle the case.
Because it is from your point of view, you should make a point of sitting down with a good Denver personal injury lawyer to include all the strongest pieces of evidence in your case. Review all of the details of the accident involving injury, fault, and disruption of personal life. To get the largest settlement, there a few things you should really concentrate on being as air-tight as possible. Liability must be proven. You need to show why the insured person or organization was at fault; why they had a duty of care and how they violated that. A good way to show that is to do a big picture walkthrough of how the accident actually occurred.
Never admit to any fault. It is the insurance company’s job to apply comparative negligence and reduce your award if they can show you were partially at fault. As a tried and true Denver car accident attorney once told me, consider how your negligence effects the total settlement, but do not admit fault. Comparative negligence laws can erase or significantly reduce your award if the case went to court.
Be specific about your injuries without exaggerating. This usually requires some medical documentation. It is recommended to go into detail about pain and how the injuries have changed your life, but any perceived exaggeration brings the risk of the company bringing out the big injury law lawyers. A motorcycle injury case can go below the cost of medical bills. They may even decide to ignore your case all together if they believe you are faking.
The last step to the demand letter is to make the actual demand. Put in a number that is around double what you expect, because the company will try to negotiate you down. Put all supporting documents into the case that you refer to. Especially important are eyewitness testimony, medical bills, and other lost receipts.
How to avoid… or if you need a divorce lawyer
Posted by denverheat in Uncategorized, denver divorce attorney, denver divorce lawyer, divorce lawyer on June 15th, 2010
- The Hot-Headed Divorce Attorney
Divorce is an emotional event. Some are lucky enough to go through it without falling to fighting, but man end up in a sort of divorce hell. When you marry someone without a prenuptial agreement, you are basicaly entering into a contract saying both of you are now one entity when it comes to ownership. At the divorce, this means that hostile ex-partners can now vie for property through the divorce court. A hostile divorce usually forces both parties to hire Denver divorce lawyers. Hiring a divorce lawyer gives you a good shot at getting more property, but it also costs more and complicates the whole thing, especially when you start battling over child custody.
So the real secret to divorce happiness is to make the decisions mutually. Of course this is not possible in all situations, but if you can work the break up between yourselves you will be able to avoid hiring a lawyer and keep the decision making process out of the courts. A mediator might be a good option if you think a neutral third party would be better than aggressive lawyers. This will keep the children out of a messy Denver family law court battle. In most common Denver Divorces, the two sides can work a good portion out my themselves. In Colorado, once you have worked out how the children and money go, you do not even have to go to court once you submit the divorce to make it official.
When it comes to the point where you have to hire a divorce lawyer, who you choose to represent you is critical in how the divorce will proceed from there. Attorneys are in business to make money, and while some good ones will counsel you on what choices you need to make to keep your family and yourself happy, it is always in their best interest to make the most money possible. In our adversarial system, the lawyer’s job is to protect their clients interests as well as possible. If you want as peaceful a divorce as possible tell your lawyer. If your partner hires an aggressive lawyer, you may have to fight back. Lawyers will not mind using children as bargaining chips to get the most out of their adversary. Eventually most people run out of money for legal fees and settle anyways so I advise against that whenever possible.
In some cases where you agree on the general principles, both parties can use one lawyer. In our system a lawyer cannot fully represent two people at odds so it is important that the parties can compromise. I had one client that used a Denver motorcycle lawyer for their divorce just to do the paperwork. Try to keep it civil, because if a major disagreement arises, the lawyer will have to give one or both clients to another attorney.
There is another type of divorce lawyer called a collaborative attorney, who will work with another attorney in his profession to share information and work towards a settlement. These lawyers sign a contract saying that they cannot represent either party in court. This allows the clients to have a clear mind knowing their lawyers do not have a monetary incentive to go to court.
There are some cases when you need to hire the traditional adversarial aggressive divorce attorney. If there is any type of abuse or vindictive behavior. If you do not have the money, some law offices do pro bono work, and at the very least they can point you in the right direction on where to find free answers. The best protection if your spouse hires a lawyer is for you to do the same.
Defenses in Personal Injury Law
Posted by denverheat in Denver Attorney, Denver personal injury lawyer, criminal defense attorney denver, denver accident lawyer, denver law firm, personal injury, personal injury attorney on June 1st, 2010
Personal injury is an area of law with potentially huge sums awarded. A permanently debilitating injury will change a person’s life forever, and that means a liable party must pay for those changes. Whether you have been injured and need to know the possible defenses to your case, or you are building a defense yourself, here are some common things the defense will bring up.
Personal injury defenses usually focus on the plaintiff’s role in the injury, and their inaction afterward.
Who is Liable in a Car Accident?
The first, and most common defense based on the plaintiff’s actions before the action is that the plaintiff was the one responsible. Whether you choose to settle the case before it goes to court, or you try and go to court with a Denver personal injury attorney, the compensation awarded is likely to be effected if the plaintiff is proven to have any fault in the incident. In some cases where the activity involved was obviously dangerous, a court may rule you assumed the risk and therefore have no claim. Some examples where an injury would be considered an assumed risk are auto racing and skydiving. Contact sports are also usually exempt, as long as the injury occurred during what would have been considered a normal phase of the game. A light pole falling on a player is therefore not an assumed risk, and the stadium owner would be liable.
Your state may follow comparative negligence or contributory negligence law. In comparative negligence, the court uses a formula to determine the percentage of fault in the accident. So if the plaintiff was found to be 40% at fault, they will only recover 60% of the damages caused, or 100-40%. So if you were involved in a motorcycle accident on 1-25 in Denver and the total damage suffered was found to be $30,000, you would end up with only $18,000. If you believe you were partially at fault, and the amount of money at stake is large, it is imperative that you contact a Denver accident lawyer to help you argue your side. Most states use this system, but they may use pure comparative negligence, which allows the the plaintiff to recover damages even if they were 99% at fault, while the modified system caps the compensation at 50% at fault. In other words, in the modified comparative negligence system, plaintiffs must be less at fault than defendants to receive an award.
Luckily for plaintiffs, Colorado is not a contributory negligence state. In contributory negligence states, if the injured party is at all at fault, they cannot recover any damages. Since Colorado does not follow contributory law, your Denver injury lawyer will still have a chance to recover some damages even if you were partially at fault.
There are a few other ways to get out of personal injury lawsuits because of plaintiff actions afterwards that are not actually defenses. Waiting beyond the statue of limitations makes lawsuits invalid. Also not clearly linking each claim of cause and effect from the defendant’s action (or inaction) to your injury will make the argument groundless. In other words, you must prove the defendant had a duty to repair a bridge, and their failure to repair the bridge caused it to collapse, injuring your hand. Just saying they owned the bridge and your hand got injured during the collapse does not go far enough. If the plaintiff did not do a good job repairing damages, the defendant may not have to pay for the consequences of inaction.
